Nationwide protests in Iran began on December 28, 2025, after continued Economic Hardship, but also due to many Iranians now feeling extremely dissatisfied with the political structure of their country. Now, Iran Preparing For First Executions Of Protestors is giving huge hints on changing geopolitical situation. Hundreds of protests have now been taking place daily throughout every province and City of Iran, with many different segments of society represented; however, the primary demographic participating is the younger population of Iran, who continue to ask for relief from Economic Hardship and for Political Change.
The Iranian authorities have reacted with extreme and violent measures to suppress these protests, resulting in thousands killed as a result of the Iranian Regime’s security forces; mass arrests; an internet blackout of many cities; and now, reports of the Iranian Judicial System preparing to Execute numerous detainees from the protests, indicating an extreme increase in the severity of state-led repression of its population.
Iran Preparing For First Executions Of Protestors
There are two main reasons for the protests: the state of the economy and political frustration. The economy is very weak with high inflation, the local currency losing value and the increasing costs of basic needs. Additionally, Iranians are angry about the way their government has handled both corruption and the economy. As the Iran Preparing For First Executions Of Protestors, you should keep a check on this post for latest developments.
As more and more people took to the streets to demonstrate against the government’s actions, calls for reforms to politics have become more apparent as well. Some protestors have even called for the end of the monarchy.
To put an end to the protests, the government has used lethal methods such as shooting protestors with live fire. According to reports, this has led to thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of arrests of young men, students, workers and regular people who protested in public meetings.
Reasons behind the Increase in Executions in Iran
Increase in Government Rhetoric and Legal Framework
The government of Iran has employed both legal and religious language to label people opposing the government as not only protestors but also as “enemies of God” or terrorists. The accusations made against someone can incur the death penalty in accordance with Iranian law; therefore, the expansion of the charges of terrorism creates a status of criminality against a large portion of dissenters.
Death Penalty and Protest History in Iran
The Iranian judicial system has a long-standing history of utilising executions as a mechanism of political suppression. In the wake of the 2022 “Woman Life Freedom” protests, Iranian authorities increased the use of the death penalty against both demonstrators and political prisoners while charging many under vague charges, including ‘corruption on Earth’ (fisad-e fil-arz) and ‘enmity against God’ (moharebeh).
The jury trials have been criticised by numerous international human rights organisations for being unjust and lacking in due process. In earlier protest movements following the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022, a large number of demonstrators had also been executed, triggering international outrage. The use of the death penalty on protestors in previous instances fuels the present concern that the government may again use executions to suppress dissent from the population.
Global Responses
Sanctions and Diplomacy
The U.S. and EU nations have spoken out against Iran’s crackdown, applying sanctions against the Iranian leadership and penal institutions involved in repressive actions. The sanctions are intended to freeze assets of the designated leaders, as well as to signal diplomatic disapproval of human rights infringements.
Within the UN Security Council, almost all nations have urged respect for human rights and some restraint on the part of Iran, while Iran has accused Western nations of interference.
Diverse Global Reactions
While there is a large group of nations that oppose Iran’s actions, many other nations, including Russia, have suggested that foreign intervention should be avoided and have stressed the importance of pursuing diplomatic avenues.
